Skip links

Business Process Management: Low-Code vs. Traditional Dev

Business Process Management (BPM) is essential to any organization’s growth strategy. As businesses grow, they must automate and streamline their operations to stay competitive and improve customer satisfaction. BPM helps organizations achieve these goals by optimizing workflows, automating routine tasks, and enhancing team collaboration. Two popular approaches, Low-Code and Traditional Development, have particular strengths and weaknesses. The important thing is to evaluate which method is suitable for specific business scenarios. By the end of this article, you will have a clear understanding of the benefits and limitations of each approach and be able to choose the right BPM strategy for your business.

Understanding Business Process Management (BPM)

Business process management (BPM) is instrumental in helping organizations achieve operational efficiency and optimize their business processes. By aligning business objectives with processes, BPM enables organizations to streamline and automate their operations using technology. Furthermore, BPM focuses on improving customer satisfaction and delivering better business outcomes. It allows organizations to continuously improve and adapt their processes to meet ever-changing business needs. Businesses can enhance their overall process performance and drive significant business value through various methods and tools such as process automation, BPM software, and workflow management.

Significance of BPM in Today’s Business Environment

BPM IllustrationThe significance of Business Process Management (BPM) in today’s business environment is crucial. By streamlining their processes, BPM enables organizations to achieve digital transformation and stay competitive. It helps improve customer service and enhances the customer experience, increasing satisfaction and loyalty. BPM also allows for the integration of different systems and data sources, ensuring seamless process management. Additionally, it provides visibility into business processes, enabling organizations to identify areas of improvement and compliance with regulations. BPM is essential for organizations looking to optimize their operations and achieve their business goals.

Introduction to Low-Code and Traditional Development for BPM

Low-code development, a popular approach for business process management (BPM), enables organizations to build applications with minimal coding effort. In contrast, traditional development involves manual coding and programming to develop applications. Low-code development provides a visual interface for designing and building business process applications, eliminating the need for specialized coding skills. This accelerates the development process and reduces time-to-market. Traditional development, on the other hand, requires expertise in coding and programming languages. By understanding these approaches, organizations can decide which method best suits their BPM needs.

laptop and bpm

What Makes These Approaches Stand Out?

Low-code development eliminates the need for extensive coding knowledge, while traditional development offers greater customization. Low-code empowers business users to participate, whereas traditional development provides complete control. Additionally, Low-code simplifies deployment and maintenance.

Key Differences Between Low-Code and Traditional Development


  • Streamlines the process by utilizing pre-built components and templates, allowing for faster development
  • Focuses on visual modeling and drag-and-drop functionality
  • Rapid application delivery and iteration

Traditional development

  • Involves writing code from scratch to create custom applications
  • Requires coding expertise to build complex and customized
  • Offers greater flexibility for customization

Evaluating the Two Methodologies

Several factors come into play when evaluating the two methodologies for business process management. The complexity and customization requirements of the business processes need to be considered. Additionally, it is essential to evaluate the skills and expertise of the development team. Time-to-market requirements and development speed should also be assessed. Furthermore, determining the scalability and extensibility needs of the applications is crucial. Lastly, the long-term maintenance and support aspects of the applications should be considered.

A Closer Look at the Low-Code Approach for BPM

A closer look at the low-code approach for BPM reveals its unique features and advantages. Low-code BPM platforms offer a visual interface that allows business users to design and model their processes easily. These platforms provide pre-built components and templates, enabling faster development and accelerated time-to-market. Integration with other systems and technologies ensures seamless process management. Moreover, low-code BPM platforms empower business users to actively participate in process design and improvement while supporting the rapid development and deployment of business process applications. This approach revolutionizes the way businesses automate their processes.

Features and Advantages of Low-Code BPM

Low-code BPM platforms offer a user-friendly interface for designing and managing processes, promoting ease of use and accessibility. These platforms also come with built-in analytics and reporting capabilities, allowing businesses to optimize their processes for better performance. Workflow automation and task management are supported, streamlining operations and enhancing productivity. Collaboration and communication among stakeholders are facilitated, ensuring effective teamwork and informed decision-making. Additionally, Low-Code BPM platforms enforce compliance and business rules within processes, enabling organizations to maintain regulatory standards.

Potential Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Overcoming challenges in business process management is crucial for successful implementation. Lack of technical expertise can be addressed by providing training and resources to empower business users in low-code development. Integration complexity can be mitigated by choosing a low-code BPM platform that offers seamless integration capabilities. Scalability limitations can be overcome by selecting a scalable low-code BPM platform that can handle growing process needs. Customization constraints can be addressed by opting for a low-code BPM platform that allows extensive customization options. Security concerns can be tackled by implementing robust security measures and protocols to protect sensitive data.

Deep Dive into Traditional Development for BPM

Traditional development for business process management involves writing code from scratch using programming languages. This approach offers complete control over applications’ design, functionality, and customization. It requires advanced coding skills and expertise in programming languages. Traditional development allows for complex and highly tailored application development, providing flexibility in integrating with external systems and technologies. With traditional development, businesses can create applications that align with their needs and requirements. They can leverage various methods and techniques to optimize the process and achieve business value.

Strengths and Benefits of Traditional Development

Traditional development offers various customization options to meet specific business requirements. It gives developers greater control over the development process and codebase, allowing for more precise implementation. Traditional development also allows seamless integration with existing systems and technologies, ensuring compatibility and flexibility. With the potential for highly optimized and efficient code, traditional development enables businesses to achieve greater scalability and performance. These strengths make traditional development valuable for businesses looking for tailored solutions and complete control over their development projects.

Possible Pitfalls and Their Solutions

Traditional development can present several challenges in the business process management (BPM) journey:

  • It can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, leading to delays in project completion. Debugging and troubleshooting also become more complex in traditional development, requiring substantial effort from the team.
  • Traditional development often demands a high level of technical expertise, which may limit the scope of participation.
  • Maintaining and updating traditional development systems can be both intricate and costly.
  • There is a risk of vendor lock-in, wherein businesses become dependent on a particular vendor for ongoing support and updates.

However, these challenges can be mitigated by adopting BPM tools and automation technologies, which streamline the entire process and enhance efficiency.

Download FREE white paper: Document management - better, cheaper, faster

Download now
Business women

When Should Businesses Choose Low-Code BPM?

Businesses should consider low-code BPM when they require rapid application development and deployment, streamlined and automated processes, frequent updates and iterations, limited IT resources, and when agility and flexibility are top priorities. As of Gartner’s 2022 year-end forecast, the low-code development technologies market experienced a robust 20% growth in 2023. This growth can be attributed to the increasing presence of business technologists and a surge in enterprise-wide hyperautomation and composable business initiatives.

Identifying Suitable Scenarios for Low-Code Implementation

Identifying suitable scenarios for low-code implementation involves considering several factors. Processes that involve multiple stakeholders and require collaboration can benefit from low-code implementation. It is well-suited for simple and standardized processes that follow a predefined workflow. Additionally, processes with changing requirements and frequent modifications are suitable for low-code implementation. Low-code is also a good fit for departments or teams with limited coding skills or resources. Industries with strict compliance requirements can benefit from low-code implementation, ensuring efficient and compliant processes.

When is Traditional Development the Better Option?

Traditional development becomes the better option when customization and fine-tuning are crucial. It is suitable for businesses with complex processes that require flexibility. Additionally, it is preferred for large-scale projects demanding high performance, scalability, and specific security/compliance requirements. Organizations with specialized IT teams may also opt for traditional development.

Recognizing Situations Favoring Traditional Development

In specific scenarios, traditional development becomes the preferred choice for businesses. When highly customized and complex solutions are needed, traditional development proves to be more suitable. Projects requiring integration with legacy systems or technologies also favor traditional development. Industries with stringent regulatory requirements opt for traditional development to ensure compliance. Additionally, applications with heavy computational or processing requirements find traditional development a better fit. Finally, organizations prioritizing complete control and ownership over their software may choose traditional development.

Transitioning from Traditional Development to Low-Code

Assessing existing systems and identifying processes suitable for low-code can expedite development. Training and upskilling the team is crucial to adapt to low-code tools and methodologies. Prioritize processes that can benefit the most from low-code transformation. Collaborating with stakeholders sets expectations and ensures a smooth transition. Begin migrating processes gradually, starting with less critical ones. By embracing low-code, businesses can streamline their development process and achieve faster results.

Steps and Considerations for a Smooth Transition

To ensure a smooth transition from traditional development to low-code, start by evaluating the capabilities of the low-code platform and its compatibility with existing systems. Develop a comprehensive migration plan and prioritize processes based on their complexity and impact. To avoid disruption, it is crucial to ensure data integrity and proper integration during the transition. Continuously monitor and optimize the newly implemented low-code processes for maximum efficiency. Additionally, provide training and support to users to facilitate a seamless transition to the new low-code environment.

How Does Low-Code and Traditional Dev Impact the BPM Lifecycle?

Low-code and traditional development have different impacts on the BPM lifecycle. Low-code accelerates development and deployment and simplifies maintenance, while traditional development allows for more customization and fine-tuning. Both approaches have unique effects on process modeling and optimization.

What are the Future Trends in BPM: Low-Code or Traditional Dev?

Future trends in BPM include the continued rapid adoption of low-code, while traditional development will still have a role in complex processes. Hybrid approaches combining both methodologies may become more prevalent, and low-code platforms will offer advanced customization and integration capabilities. The future of BPM will involve a balance between low-code and traditional development based on specific business needs.

How to Choose the Right BPM Approach for Your Business?

Considering your business objectives and goals is crucial when selecting a BPM approach. Evaluate the level of complexity and customization needed for your processes. Assess the technical expertise and resources available within your organization. Compare the benefits of low-code BPM solutions with traditional development approaches. Seek input from key stakeholders to ensure alignment with business needs.


In conclusion, both low-code and traditional development approaches have strengths and weaknesses in business process management (BPM). Low-code offers faster development, ease of use, and flexibility, making it suitable for rapid application development and iterative improvements. On the other hand, traditional development provides more customization options, control, and scalability, making it ideal for complex and large-scale projects.

Ultimately, choosing between low-code and traditional development for BPM depends on your business needs, project requirements, and existing IT infrastructure. Consider project complexity, time constraints, budget, available resources, and long-term scalability.

To make an informed decision, evaluate each approach’s features, advantages, and potential challenges in relation to your business goals. For personalized guidance and expert advice, we encourage you to contact our team of IT professionals, experienced software developers, and BPM experts. Contact us today to explore the best BPM solution for your organization.

Leverage the expertise of over 200 professionals to optimize your business

Start now